You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Separating Benchmarks for physical sorted union over large columns in SQL planner based on Datatype (#18599)
## Which issue does this PR close?
<!--
We generally require a GitHub issue to be filed for all bug fixes and
enhancements and this helps us generate change logs for our releases.
You can link an issue to this PR using the GitHub syntax. For example
`Closes#123` indicates that this PR will close issue #123.
-->
- as discussed in #17261
## Rationale for this change
Logical Plan for datatype Int64 and UInt64 differs, UInt64 Logical
Plan's Union are wrapped up in Projection, and EliminateNestedUnion
OptimezerRule is not applied leading to significantly longer execution
time.
<!--
Why are you proposing this change? If this is already explained clearly
in the issue then this section is not needed.
Explaining clearly why changes are proposed helps reviewers understand
your changes and offer better suggestions for fixes.
-->
## What changes are included in this PR?
Separating Benchmarks based on datatype, converting a datatype specific
function to a generic one.
<!--
There is no need to duplicate the description in the issue here but it
is sometimes worth providing a summary of the individual changes in this
PR.
-->
## Are these changes tested?
Yes.
<!--
We typically require tests for all PRs in order to:
1. Prevent the code from being accidentally broken by subsequent changes
2. Serve as another way to document the expected behavior of the code
If tests are not included in your PR, please explain why (for example,
are they covered by existing tests)?
-->
## Are there any user-facing changes?
No, benchmarks only.
<!--
If there are user-facing changes then we may require documentation to be
updated before approving the PR.
-->
<!--
If there are any breaking changes to public APIs, please add the `api
change` label.
-->
---------
Co-authored-by: Andrew Lamb <andrew@nerdnetworks.org>
0 commit comments