You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Every expression in DataFusion has a name, which is used as the column name. For example, in this example the output contains a single column with the name "COUNT(aggregate_test_100.c9)":
These names are used to refer to the columns in both subqueries as well as internally from one stage of the LogicalPlan to another. For example
❯ select "COUNT(aggregate_test_100.c9)" + 1 from (select count(c9) from aggregate_test_100) as sq;
+--------------------------------------------+
| sq.COUNT(aggregate_test_100.c9) + Int64(1) |
+--------------------------------------------+
| 101 |
+--------------------------------------------+
1 row in set. Query took 0.005 seconds.
Implication
DataFusion contains an extensive set of OptimizerRules that may rewrite the plan and/or its expressions so they execute more quickly. However, the optimizer rules must so
Because DataFusion identifies columns using a string name, it means it is critical that the names of expressions are not changed by the optimizer when it rewrites expressions. This is typically accomplished by renaming a rewritten expression by adding an alias.
Here is a simple example of such a rewrite. The expression 1 + 2 can be internally simplified to 3 but must still be displayed the same as 1 + 2:
I tried to consolidate this learning into #3727 but , as @liukun4515 has pointed out #3727 (comment) , there are likely several other places that have similar bugs lurking
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
There are currently two ways to create a "name" for an expression in the logical plan.
/// Returns the name of this expression as it should appear in a schema. This name
/// will not include any CAST expressions.
pub fn name(&self) -> Result<String> {
create_name(self)
}
/// Returns a full and complete string representation of this expression.
pub fn canonical_name(&self) -> String {
format!("{}", self)
}
I have seen that we sometimes use name when we should use canonical_name instead.
Background
Every expression in DataFusion has a name, which is used as the column name. For example, in this example the output contains a single column with the name
"COUNT(aggregate_test_100.c9)"
:These names are used to refer to the columns in both subqueries as well as internally from one stage of the
LogicalPlan
to another. For exampleImplication
DataFusion contains an extensive set of OptimizerRules that may rewrite the plan and/or its expressions so they execute more quickly. However, the optimizer rules must so
Because DataFusion identifies columns using a string name, it means it is critical that the names of expressions are not changed by the optimizer when it rewrites expressions. This is typically accomplished by renaming a rewritten expression by adding an alias.
Here is a simple example of such a rewrite. The expression
1 + 2
can be internally simplified to3
but must still be displayed the same as1 + 2
:Looking at the
EXPLAIN
output we can see that the optimizer has effectively rewritten1 + 2
into effectively3 as "1 + 2"
:If the expression name is not preserved, bugs such as #3704 and #3555 occur where the expected columns can not be found.
Problems
There are at least three places that we have rediscovered the issue of names changing when rewriting expressions such as #3704, #3555 and https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion/blob/master/datafusion/optimizer/src/simplify_expressions.rs#L316
I tried to consolidate this learning into #3727 but , as @liukun4515 has pointed out #3727 (comment) , there are likely several other places that have similar bugs lurking
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: