Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[TIR] Enforce buffer pointer var type to be consistent with dtype. #6317

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 21, 2020

Conversation

tqchen
Copy link
Member

@tqchen tqchen commented Aug 21, 2020

Now that we have type_annotation in tir::Var.
We should make sure that the type annotation to be consistent with the dtype in Buffer declaration and Allocation.

This change allows future passes to directly use the content type information via type_annotation.

This PR turns on the enforcement on Buffer and also fixed a few cases for Allocate.
A follow up PR need to fix a few more cases in the hybrid script parsing
before everything can be made consistent.

@tqchen
Copy link
Member Author

tqchen commented Aug 21, 2020

cc @spectrometerHBH

Now that we have type_annotation in tir::Var.
We should make sure that the type annotation to be consistent with the dtype
in Buffer declaration and Allocation.

This change allows future passes to directly use the content type information via type_annotation.

This PR turns on the enforcement on Buffer and also fixed a few cases for Allocate.
A follow up PR need to fix a few more cases in the hybrid script parsing
before everything can be made consistent.
@tqchen
Copy link
Member Author

tqchen commented Aug 21, 2020

Copy link
Contributor

@ZihengJiang ZihengJiang left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@@ -263,6 +263,9 @@ TVM_STATIC_IR_FUNCTOR(ReprPrinter, vtable)
// Allocate
Allocate::Allocate(Var buffer_var, DataType dtype, Array<PrimExpr> extents, PrimExpr condition,
Stmt body) {
// TODO(tvm-team): Add invariant check to make sure
// IsPointerPType(buffer_var->type_annotation, dtype)
// once we fix the allocate hybrid script printing.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Will it be addressed soon in a follow-up PR for hybrid script?

Copy link
Member Author

@tqchen tqchen Aug 21, 2020

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yes, i believe we can send another PR once the hybrid script printing part is fixed.

@tqchen tqchen merged commit 061bb01 into apache:master Aug 21, 2020
@tqchen
Copy link
Member Author

tqchen commented Aug 21, 2020

trevor-m pushed a commit to trevor-m/tvm that referenced this pull request Aug 26, 2020
…pache#6317)

Now that we have type_annotation in tir::Var.
We should make sure that the type annotation to be consistent with the dtype
in Buffer declaration and Allocation.

This change allows future passes to directly use the content type information via type_annotation.

This PR turns on the enforcement on Buffer and also fixed a few cases for Allocate.
A follow up PR need to fix a few more cases in the hybrid script parsing
before everything can be made consistent.
trevor-m pushed a commit to trevor-m/tvm that referenced this pull request Aug 26, 2020
…pache#6317)

Now that we have type_annotation in tir::Var.
We should make sure that the type annotation to be consistent with the dtype
in Buffer declaration and Allocation.

This change allows future passes to directly use the content type information via type_annotation.

This PR turns on the enforcement on Buffer and also fixed a few cases for Allocate.
A follow up PR need to fix a few more cases in the hybrid script parsing
before everything can be made consistent.
trevor-m pushed a commit to trevor-m/tvm that referenced this pull request Aug 26, 2020
…pache#6317)

Now that we have type_annotation in tir::Var.
We should make sure that the type annotation to be consistent with the dtype
in Buffer declaration and Allocation.

This change allows future passes to directly use the content type information via type_annotation.

This PR turns on the enforcement on Buffer and also fixed a few cases for Allocate.
A follow up PR need to fix a few more cases in the hybrid script parsing
before everything can be made consistent.
trevor-m pushed a commit to trevor-m/tvm that referenced this pull request Sep 2, 2020
…pache#6317)

Now that we have type_annotation in tir::Var.
We should make sure that the type annotation to be consistent with the dtype
in Buffer declaration and Allocation.

This change allows future passes to directly use the content type information via type_annotation.

This PR turns on the enforcement on Buffer and also fixed a few cases for Allocate.
A follow up PR need to fix a few more cases in the hybrid script parsing
before everything can be made consistent.
trevor-m pushed a commit to neo-ai/tvm that referenced this pull request Sep 3, 2020
…pache#6317)

Now that we have type_annotation in tir::Var.
We should make sure that the type annotation to be consistent with the dtype
in Buffer declaration and Allocation.

This change allows future passes to directly use the content type information via type_annotation.

This PR turns on the enforcement on Buffer and also fixed a few cases for Allocate.
A follow up PR need to fix a few more cases in the hybrid script parsing
before everything can be made consistent.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants