Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Relay] Make check stricter by using Feature. Fixed multiple bugs. #6326

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Aug 25, 2020

Conversation

MarisaKirisame
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for contributing to TVM! Please refer to guideline https://tvm.apache.org/docs/contribute/ for useful information and tips. After the pull request is submitted, please request code reviews from Reviewers by @ them in the pull request thread.
@jroesch @junrushao1994 @zhiics please help review.
Also, do anyone know why test_pass_merge_composite suddenly failed? I hadnt touched any of the files, and it shouldnt call CPS/PE/AD.

lint

lint

lint

fix lint

lint

update

lint

save

save

save

lint

format

format

save

save

fix

use a form more suitable for numeric check

save
@junrushao
Copy link
Member

Please ping me when this PR is ready for review :-)

@MarisaKirisame
Copy link
Contributor Author

@junrushao1994 it is. I am trying to fix the ci though.

*
* \return a string representation.
*/
std::string Print() const;
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Maybe ToString sounds better?

test_pattern_with_check()
test_diamond_not_merge()
test_type_check()
#pytest.main([__file__])
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

recover this?

Copy link
Member

@junrushao junrushao left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. Thanks @MarisaKirisame!

@MarisaKirisame MarisaKirisame changed the title [Relay] Make check stricter by using Feature. [Relay] Make check stricter by using Feature. Fixed multiple bugs. Aug 25, 2020
@MarisaKirisame
Copy link
Contributor Author

@wweic @vinx13 can you guys review?

Copy link
Member

@zhiics zhiics left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@jroesch jroesch merged commit 1a26a2e into apache:master Aug 25, 2020
trevor-m pushed a commit to trevor-m/tvm that referenced this pull request Aug 26, 2020
…pache#6326)

* save

lint

lint

lint

fix lint

lint

update

lint

save

save

save

lint

format

format

save

save

fix

use a form more suitable for numeric check

save

* save

* save

* lint

* save

* lint

* fix

* fix
trevor-m pushed a commit to trevor-m/tvm that referenced this pull request Aug 26, 2020
…pache#6326)

* save

lint

lint

lint

fix lint

lint

update

lint

save

save

save

lint

format

format

save

save

fix

use a form more suitable for numeric check

save

* save

* save

* lint

* save

* lint

* fix

* fix
trevor-m pushed a commit to trevor-m/tvm that referenced this pull request Aug 26, 2020
…pache#6326)

* save

lint

lint

lint

fix lint

lint

update

lint

save

save

save

lint

format

format

save

save

fix

use a form more suitable for numeric check

save

* save

* save

* lint

* save

* lint

* fix

* fix
trevor-m pushed a commit to trevor-m/tvm that referenced this pull request Sep 2, 2020
…pache#6326)

* save

lint

lint

lint

fix lint

lint

update

lint

save

save

save

lint

format

format

save

save

fix

use a form more suitable for numeric check

save

* save

* save

* lint

* save

* lint

* fix

* fix
trevor-m pushed a commit to neo-ai/tvm that referenced this pull request Sep 3, 2020
…pache#6326)

* save

lint

lint

lint

fix lint

lint

update

lint

save

save

save

lint

format

format

save

save

fix

use a form more suitable for numeric check

save

* save

* save

* lint

* save

* lint

* fix

* fix
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants