You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I was browsing the official website of the database today, and I noticed that the partitioning feature highly overlaps with our definition of sharding table. This has piqued my curiosity as to why we are not adopting a database partitioning approach for logical processing. According to my tests, the support for our partitioned tables may not even be that robust. Perhaps in the future, we could advocate for a database and partitioning architecture among our users. After all, such a practice would push down our routing logic to the physical nodes.
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
-
I was browsing the official website of the database today, and I noticed that the partitioning feature highly overlaps with our definition of sharding table. This has piqued my curiosity as to why we are not adopting a database partitioning approach for logical processing. According to my tests, the support for our partitioned tables may not even be that robust. Perhaps in the future, we could advocate for a database and partitioning architecture among our users. After all, such a practice would push down our routing logic to the physical nodes.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions