Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Ability to Group Charts And Dashboards via Tags or Folders #19398

Closed
kevinpostlewaite opened this issue Mar 28, 2022 Discussed in #19194 · 9 comments
Closed

Ability to Group Charts And Dashboards via Tags or Folders #19398

kevinpostlewaite opened this issue Mar 28, 2022 Discussed in #19194 · 9 comments

Comments

@kevinpostlewaite
Copy link

Discussed in #19194

Originally posted by kevinpostlewaite April 15, 2020
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
It's difficult to find specific charts and dashboards that I've created.

Describe the solution you'd like
As a user, I would like to be able to logically group my charts and my dashboards. I would like either folders or to be able to filter by tags when accessing the list of charts and dashboards.

Additional context
This was originally an issue submitted in April 2020. It was recently and inexplicably converted to a discussion, I am resubmitting it as an issue.

This is a much requested feature with many closed issues:

There's even a PR but it appears that it may need to be rewritten to be accepted:
Tagging frontend

@francescomucio
Copy link

In a big organization with multiple teams using the same BI tool, folders will provide a way to organize our dashboards and provide a better user experience (less confusion).

The global search functionality solves a different kind of problem

@rascasse83
Copy link

Preset has the concept of "workspaces" which could help with this requirement.
Superset would benefit from something similar, even if it is not a workspace, but rather a folder structure.
Alternatively, we could place a web based reporting catalog on top of superset, to have a additional layer of categorisation & security (using the new embedded dashboard functionality, or even the query URL parameter &standalone=true technique).

@vietvudanh
Copy link

Metabase's Collections is a good way to manage dashboards and queries too.
Structure dashboards and charts into folders make authorization much easier too.

@goldjee
Copy link
Contributor

goldjee commented Dec 26, 2022

Agree, object grouping is a must for a large BI product. Given that a dashboard usually consists of several charts, the full list of them gets bloated as well. Say, you have 10 dashboards with 4 charts per dashboard on average. That's 40 charts. Quite a big list. Working alongside with other departments on the same instance of Superset becomes unnecessarily complicated because of that.

@MaslikovEgor
Copy link

In company we have lots of charts and dashboards in different segments. So tags of folder grouping is really what we interesting in and waiting for!

Hope someone will implement this feature

@LeoDiep
Copy link

LeoDiep commented Feb 14, 2023

is there any update on Folder grouping of dashboard yet, cause we are desperately needing it

@juanchristensen
Copy link

In other platforms you create Dashboards -> Charts -> Queries, which intrinsically means there is partitioning of the entities.
Given that in Superset the model is inverted (Datasets -> Charts -> Dashboards), this feature request seems extremely necessary for any medium to large sized organization.

Not having a basic capability for grouping entities (datasets, charts, dashboards, and potentially columns/metrics as well), takes you down on an unsustainable road where the whole partitioning depends on naming convention and search.

@raags
Copy link

raags commented May 31, 2023

Tags via TAGGING_SYSTEM seem to have been merged recently: #20876

@michael-s-molina
Copy link
Member

Closing this as tags have been implemented.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

10 participants