Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Bug] [Frontend] Matrix C of Gemm operator in ONNX could be optional #7263

Closed
luyaor opened this issue Jan 12, 2021 · 0 comments
Closed

[Bug] [Frontend] Matrix C of Gemm operator in ONNX could be optional #7263

luyaor opened this issue Jan 12, 2021 · 0 comments

Comments

@luyaor
Copy link
Contributor

luyaor commented Jan 12, 2021

Description

When compiling following model with TVM, it will error on parsing. I think it is because matrix C for inputs could be optional by ONNX specification. Check here: https://github.com/onnx/onnx/blob/master/docs/Operators.md#gemm

The model(with ONNX as frontend) with error is as follows, check bug.onnx in bug7.zip.

Error Log

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "check.py", line 11, in <module>
    mod, params = relay.frontend.from_onnx(onnx_model, {})
  File "/Users/luyaor/Documents/tvm/python/tvm/relay/frontend/onnx.py", line 2806, in from_onnx
    mod, params = g.from_onnx(graph, opset, freeze_params)
  File "/Users/luyaor/Documents/tvm/python/tvm/relay/frontend/onnx.py", line 2613, in from_onnx
    op = self._convert_operator(op_name, inputs, attr, opset)
  File "/Users/luyaor/Documents/tvm/python/tvm/relay/frontend/onnx.py", line 2721, in _convert_operator
    sym = convert_map[op_name](inputs, attrs, self._params)
  File "/Users/luyaor/Documents/tvm/python/tvm/relay/frontend/onnx.py", line 510, in _impl_v1
    assert len(inputs) == 3, "Gemm op take 3 inputs, {} given".format(len(inputs))
AssertionError: Gemm op take 3 inputs, 2 given

How to reproduce

Environment

Python3, with tvm, onnx

tvm version: c31e338 Wed Dec 9 14:52:58 2020 +0900

  1. Download bug7.zip
  2. Run python check.py.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants