We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Currently we follow otel http semantic conventions: https://opentelemetry.io/docs/specs/otel/trace/semantic_conventions/http/ There aren't many conventions for graphql yet, but we try to follow them and will match behavior as they are developed: https://opentelemetry.io/docs/specs/otel/trace/semantic_conventions/instrumentation/graphql/
Users have asked that there should at least be an option to mark otel status as failed if graphql errors are present in the response.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Will be done as part of #3226
Sorry, something went wrong.
Reopening as we still need to add this functionality.
No branches or pull requests
Currently we follow otel http semantic conventions: https://opentelemetry.io/docs/specs/otel/trace/semantic_conventions/http/
There aren't many conventions for graphql yet, but we try to follow them and will match behavior as they are developed: https://opentelemetry.io/docs/specs/otel/trace/semantic_conventions/instrumentation/graphql/
Users have asked that there should at least be an option to mark otel status as failed if graphql errors are present in the response.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: