Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Missing feature for ignoring windows nodes in an AKS cluster containing both windows and Linux pools #3593

Closed
fmad opened this issue Feb 10, 2023 · 4 comments
Labels
kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. priority/backlog Higher priority than priority/awaiting-more-evidence. target/kubernetes Issues relating to kubernetes cluster scanning

Comments

@fmad
Copy link

fmad commented Feb 10, 2023

Description

What did you expect to happen?

Be able to ignore windows nodes automatically and/or by passing a flag.

What happened instead?

Just takes forever (estimated on a sample cluster with 1145 objects - over 24 hours!)

Output of run with -debug:

(paste your output here)

Output of trivy -v:

Version: 0.37.2
Vulnerability DB:
  Version: 2
  UpdatedAt: 2023-02-10 12:07:56.846216503 +0000 UTC
  NextUpdate: 2023-02-10 18:07:56.846216103 +0000 UTC
  DownloadedAt: 2023-02-10 15:42:30.1247773 +0000 UTC

Additional details (base image name, container registry info...):

@fmad fmad added the kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. label Feb 10, 2023
@mineshp100
Copy link

Yes, I agree. This would be helpful for those consumers who have mixed OS kubernetes clusters. +1

@itaysk itaysk added the target/kubernetes Issues relating to kubernetes cluster scanning label Feb 11, 2023
@github-actions
Copy link

This issue is stale because it has been labeled with inactivity.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and will be auto-closed. label Apr 13, 2023
@itaysk itaysk removed the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and will be auto-closed. label Apr 13, 2023
@knqyf263 knqyf263 added the priority/backlog Higher priority than priority/awaiting-more-evidence. label May 9, 2023
@chen-keinan
Copy link
Contributor

chen-keinan commented Jun 6, 2023

@fmad @mineshp100 trivy v0.42.0 support exclude node scanning by labels see exclude nodes

@knqyf263
Copy link
Collaborator

knqyf263 commented Jun 6, 2023

Please reopen this issue if it doesn't meet your requirements.

@knqyf263 knqyf263 closed this as completed Jun 6, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. priority/backlog Higher priority than priority/awaiting-more-evidence. target/kubernetes Issues relating to kubernetes cluster scanning
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants