You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
thanks for your excellent paper! I have a questions about the data preprocessing in the implementation code.
A small observation about data processing, for the 'yahoo', 'amazon', 'agnews' and 'dbpedia' dataset, besides the 'content' column, they also include the 'title' (and 'answer' for 'yahoo') column. In the implementation in IDBR and MbPA++, they only use 'content' for training and discard other information such as 'title' and 'answer'. In Progressive Prompts all texts are taken into account, I'm wondering if this will leads to some performance difference and did you compare them?
Many thanks in advance for your clarification!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
have you addressed the problem above for the value of "select_k_per_class"?
mingyang-wang26
changed the title
Argument "select_k_per_class" should be 16 for T5 experiments as stated in the paper?
Questions about the argument "select_k_per_class" and the number of samples used in the experiments
Aug 18, 2023
mingyang-wang26
changed the title
Questions about the argument "select_k_per_class" and the number of samples used in the experiments
Questions about the data preprocessing method
Oct 10, 2023
Hi,
thanks for your excellent paper! I have a questions about the data preprocessing in the implementation code.
A small observation about data processing, for the 'yahoo', 'amazon', 'agnews' and 'dbpedia' dataset, besides the 'content' column, they also include the 'title' (and 'answer' for 'yahoo') column. In the implementation in IDBR and MbPA++, they only use 'content' for training and discard other information such as 'title' and 'answer'. In Progressive Prompts all texts are taken into account, I'm wondering if this will leads to some performance difference and did you compare them?
Many thanks in advance for your clarification!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: