Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Larger jiggling time period / random jiggle time within maximum configured time? #45

Open
fs366e2spm opened this issue Apr 22, 2021 · 3 comments
Assignees
Milestone

Comments

@fs366e2spm
Copy link

Hi,
Is there a reason for the 60s as the maximum jiggle time?
Tried to set -s:300 for e.g. 5min via command line but it seems all values larger 60s are not possible.

Not sure if this has already been brought up - what do you think about a setting to always jiggle for random time with the set time ?

@cerebrate
Copy link
Member

It's mostly arbitrary; the settings slider needs to have a maximum where its right-hand end is, and 60s fits comfortably in the window while still being usable at common resolutions. It didn't seem like a particularly important limitation, as given the nature of idle detection, longer durations seemed to be less and less useful.

what do you think about a setting to always jiggle for random time with the set time ?

Not sure what you mean by that?

@fs366e2spm
Copy link
Author

A possibility would be to e.g. to allow a larger time period via command line only. The visual slider could still show 60s (max) time.

With a random jiggle time I meant to have randomized jiggle time within the mas set time, e.g. once the mouse jiggles after 5sec, then 37, 52, 14, 22... any random seconds.

@cerebrate cerebrate modified the milestones: 1.0.26, 2.0.26 Apr 30, 2021
@cerebrate cerebrate modified the milestones: 2.0.26, 3.0 May 14, 2023
@cerebrate cerebrate self-assigned this May 14, 2023
@xilraazz
Copy link

xilraazz commented Mar 1, 2024

Is this still on the radar? I would also like this feature.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants