You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I'm going to merge this as is, I don't know if it is possible to determine the branch name where the nil values should be added to. will create an issue to resolve this later
They should go into the same branch as the lhs of the : operator. This might be possible only if the top node of the lhs is a Named or Rule. I think this needs to be required for all < and > variants in order to build the binary tree structure correctly. Perhaps it also applies to , variants.
I'm going to merge this as is, I don't know if it is possible to determine the branch name where the nil values should be added to. will create an issue to resolve this later
Originally posted by @anz-gordonj7 in #43 (comment)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: