Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Revive package naming convention in contributing #815

Closed
BANOnotIT opened this issue Apr 17, 2024 · 3 comments · Fixed by #840
Closed

Revive package naming convention in contributing #815

BANOnotIT opened this issue Apr 17, 2024 · 3 comments · Fixed by #840
Assignees
@krulod

Comments

@BANOnotIT
Copy link
Collaborator

There was a separate guide dedicated to entities naming in reatom. Package naming should be restored and put in contributing.md st least.
@krulod krulod self-assigned this May 12, 2024
@krulod
Copy link
Collaborator

krulod commented May 13, 2024

I failed to find the package naming convention in repo history. Could you give me the link or tell if there were any details to write about besides npm/web/node prefixes?

@BANOnotIT
Copy link
Collaborator Author

BANOnotIT commented May 13, 2024 •
edited
Loading

Context of the issue was discussed in chat: https://t.me/reatom_ru/64036

@BANOnotIT
Copy link
Collaborator Author

My interaction with convention document was in
403a851

@krulod krulod mentioned this issue May 14, 2024
Merged
@krulod krulod linked a pull request May 14, 2024 that will close this issue
docs: update contributing.md and package-generator #840
Merged
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@krulod krulod

Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

docs: update contributing.md and package-generator artalar/reatom
2 participants
@BANOnotIT @krulod