-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 92
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Compilation Question #64
Comments
I haven't actually thought about it to be honest. What would be the reason you want to do the compilation instead of the binary release? |
Trust, the ability to customize the source, the ability to customize the build flags, the ability to install development versions, etc. |
I would be happy to collaborate on something like that. You said you have a script that we could use as a starting point? |
I do have a script, but the licensing is incompatible with MIT. The gvm project has the functionality and also uses MIT. Relevant line in the install file. |
Does asdf-golang have any interest in a compilation option in the future? I ran this command
asdf install golang ref:$(asdf latest golang)
expecting compilation, but received a binary installation instead.gvm solves the bootstrapping issue by first compiling go1.4 and then compiling later versions.
I have a script that does this and it looks like gvm would work, but I am exploring the option of standardizing my tools around asdf.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: