-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 187
This issue was moved to a discussion.
You can continue the conversation there. Go to discussion →
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Any reason to use raw function's pointer? #682
Comments
@Jerrody Are you referring whether a function is loaded generically through Same for |
I'm not big professional I refer to this article where shown that calling of https://gpuopen.com/learn/reducing-vulkan-api-call-overhead/ So, my question is does |
@Jerrody Lines 3051 to 3052 in 29b935b
Lines 22 to 24 in 29b935b
Which is used when creating a device: Lines 341 to 357 in 29b935b
tl;dr: Ash uses optimized function pointers (specific to an instance/device) in almost all cases 1. Footnotes
|
This issue was moved to a discussion.
You can continue the conversation there. Go to discussion →
For example, in C/C++ headers if we call a PFN we skip the step when loader choose what driver to call.
Do I need to call a PFN or ash does all work?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: