Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Collection include for the in-memory provider #17089

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 12, 2019

Conversation

ajcvickers
Copy link
Contributor

Part of #16963

@ajcvickers ajcvickers requested a review from smitpatel August 12, 2019 01:07
@ajcvickers ajcvickers force-pushed the VeryInclusiveKenny0807 branch from d0ff183 to 3f20978 Compare August 12, 2019 15:15
Copy link
Contributor

@smitpatel smitpatel left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Commented on couple of things. I don't think it is much worth trying to resolve them for InMemory since it is purely testing database. But I am fine either way.

@AndriySvyryd - would sign off for concurrency changes.

@smitpatel smitpatel requested a review from AndriySvyryd August 12, 2019 16:39
@AndriySvyryd
Copy link
Member

Doesn't this effectively fix #7375? So #8865 can be closed

@ajcvickers
Copy link
Contributor Author

@AndriySvyryd Yes, it does fix that issue, although there may still need to be further improvements if we find there are async cases that we don't handle.

@ajcvickers ajcvickers force-pushed the VeryInclusiveKenny0807 branch from 3f20978 to 456efe7 Compare August 12, 2019 21:44
@ajcvickers ajcvickers merged commit 87aaf63 into release/3.0 Aug 12, 2019
@ghost ghost deleted the VeryInclusiveKenny0807 branch August 12, 2019 22:07
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants