-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
New Concept: [several planetary science concepts] #334
Comments
Updated "Inner planets" and "Outer planets" as described above. |
Planetary dynamics added as child of "Planetary science." Child concepts "volcanism" and "tectonics" as described above. For further discussion about the placement of this concept, see #335. |
Instead of "Radar observations," we're going with "Remote sensing" as a "catch-all term for any planetary work using remote observations. It would include radar, but also VNIR, TIR, etc. wavelengths." |
Aurorae (child of planetary magnetospheres) and Lightning (child of planetary atmospheres) added. Location might be subject to change in future releases, but I think these are good for now. That's everything for this issue! |
Name the new concept
Radar observations
Tectonics
Volcanism
Jovian planets
Planetary dynamics
Terrestrial planets
Aurorae (see also #318)
Lightning (see also #265)
Additional Comments
See also attached spreadsheet
Radar Observations: radar observations is more general that radar astronomy. We use radar instruments on spacecraft to image the surface, and we do not refer to this as radar astronomy.
Tectonics: plate tectonics is a subset of tectonics, that only really operates on Earth. Tectonics would be a better, more general concept.
Volcanism: Volcanoes is not the same as volcanism. Volcanism is the more general term for volcanic processes, that don't all come from volcanoes. I would advocate replacing "Volcanoes" with "Volcanism".
Jovian planets: Could we simplify it to "Gas Giants"? That would cover Jovian planets in our solar system, and extrasolar systems.
Planetary dynamics: We should have planetary dynamics as well [as exoplanet dynamics]. There is a huge field of planetary dynamics that does not look at extrasolar objects.
Terrestrial planets: Could we replace "Inner planets" with "Terrestrial planets"? That is the more widely used term for the rocky bodies in the inner solar system.
Aurorae (see also #318)
Lightning (see also #265)
Please include any additional comments/feedback
Concepts suggested by Catherine Neish, Chair of the Publications Subcommittee for the Division for Planetary Sciences of the AAS
Planetary_Science_Keywords.xlsx
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: