Community SIG Meeting, 4PM UTC Tuesday November 9 2021

[asyncapi-bot]

This is the meeting for the AsyncAPI Special Interest Group (SIG). You're invited to join us and ask questions. The meeting takes place on alternate Tuesdays. Recordings from the previous meetings are available in this playlist on YouTube.

This time we meet at 4PM UTC

Join this mailing list to get an always-up-to-date invite to the meeting in your calendar. You can also check AsyncAPI Calendar.

Agenda

Don't wait for the meeting to discuss topics that already have issues. Feel free to comment on them earlier.

1. Q&A
2. Place for your topic
3. Progressing with decision/consensus on topic of Response specification in RFC, see discussion and proposal for more info here: feat: request/response support in both operation and message objects spec#594 - @smarek
4. Collective work efforts towards 3.0 Collectively working on 3.0.0 #157 - @jonaslagoni
5. Conference efforts updates - @derberg
6. if there's enough time Proposal to allow defining schema format other than default one (AsyncAPI Schema) spec#622 - @magicmatatjahu
7. Q&A

Notes

• We skipped Progressing with decision/consensus on the topic of Response specification in RFC, see discussion and proposal for more info here. It will be discussed at the next meetings. Please get familiar with feat: request/response support in both operation and message objects spec#594
• We discussed an idea to have a separate meeting just dedicated to AsyncAPI 3.0 release that could help us organize the work towards this goal. Please join this discussion Collectively working on 3.0.0 #157 if you are interested
• The summary from the conference is - all is good 😄 Presenters cards ready to start promotion of individual talks. We also kicked of marketing, but stopped on Twitter as it was not bringing any value at all.
• We talked about Proposal to allow defining schema format other than default one (AsyncAPI Schema). Maciej explained the purpose of Proposal to allow defining schema format other than default one (AsyncAPI Schema) spec#622 and what goods it will bring to the spec. We identified possible breaking changes and advised that might be easier to address with the proposal a smaller scope and focus one feature at a time. Also, suggestion was made to open a PR where it will be easier to see what proposal is changing.
• We announced winners of the Hackathon -> AsyncAPI Hackathon 2021 Winners Announcement #165

Chat

17:08:05 From Alejandra Quetzalli : Holaaaaa Barbaño :D
17:08:05 From Lukasz Gornicki : asyncapi/spec#594
17:08:20 From Barbaño : Hi :)
17:09:58 From Sergio Moya : I’ll need to leave in about 10 mins! But how cool is to see all your faces :D
17:10:09 From Alejandra Quetzalli : Que bueno verte Sergio :D !
17:10:54 From David Boyne : Yeah sorry got camera off I’m sorting out kids haha whilst listening
17:11:35 From Aayush Sahu : Hurry up Lukasz! :D
17:11:39 From Alejandra Quetzalli : Haha the joys of fatherhood, Dave
17:11:46 From Aayush Sahu : with the recording*
17:12:37 From Jonas Lagoni : #157
17:16:20 From Sergio Moya : #163
17:16:57 From Alejandra Quetzalli : It’s so cool!!
17:19:58 From Alejandra Quetzalli : I like that idea!!
17:20:07 From Alejandra Quetzalli : A slack channel for changing to spec v3 could be so sueful
17:20:11 From Alejandra Quetzalli : useful*
17:25:00 From Sergio Moya : Have to leave. Don’t say anything Lukasz keep going with live video.
17:25:06 From Sergio Moya : Will keep up later
17:25:14 From Jonas Lagoni : Cya Sergio!
17:25:16 From David Boyne : Cya 👋
17:25:21 From Maciej Urbańczyk : Bye!
17:25:31 From Barbaño : Bye Sergio!
17:26:09 From David Boyne : If we git clone Jonas x 50 we can get the 3.0 release for Jan 🤠
17:26:16 From Alejandra Quetzalli : OMG hahahahahahah
17:26:21 From Alejandra Quetzalli : Git clone jonas
17:26:24 From Alejandra Quetzalli : 😂
17:27:29 From Alejandra Quetzalli : Thank you barbaño !!
17:27:34 From Alejandra Quetzalli : :D
17:29:15 From Lukasz Gornicki : https://drive.google.com/drive/u/1/folders/1QBwLkkcVSFWL125ZvA22_quiRNbXQeXg
17:38:05 From _acebuild : This is super awesome!!!
17:40:45 From Lukasz Gornicki : asyncapi/spec#622
18:03:38 From _acebuild : Thanks Guys
18:04:27 From Alejandra Quetzalli : Wohooo 🥳
18:05:18 From _acebuild : Lukasz send my swagggggggg
18:05:34 From Alejandra Quetzalli : All the SWAG

Recording

https://youtu.be/_AvA5cGmuPs

[smarek]

Proposal of theme: Progressing with decision/consensus on topic of Response specification in RFC, see discussion and proposal for more info here: asyncapi/spec#594

[derberg]

@smarek added to the agenda!

[jonaslagoni]

I would like to highlight the discussion about how we can push the efforts of reaching 3.0.0 - #157

[magicmatatjahu]

I see that there are many topics and probably will not have enough time for mine, but I add it not to forget for the next meeting - Proposal to allow defining schema format other than default one (AsyncAPI Schema) asyncapi/spec#622