Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

AsyncAPI open meeting, Tuesday May 25 2021 4PM UTC #27

Closed
derberg opened this issue May 19, 2021 · 3 comments
Closed

AsyncAPI open meeting, Tuesday May 25 2021 4PM UTC #27

derberg opened this issue May 19, 2021 · 3 comments
Labels

Comments

@derberg
Copy link
Member

derberg commented May 19, 2021

This is the meeting for the AsyncAPI Special Interest Group (SIG). You're invited to join us and ask questions. The meeting takes place on alternate Tuesdays. Recordings from the previous meetings are available in this playlist on YouTube.

This time we meet at 4PM UTC

If you want to make proposals for the specification and/or the tooling, please reach out in our Slack workspace or just leave a comment below.

Join this mailing list to get an always-up-to-date invite to the meeting in your calendar.

Attendees

Join us if you want to know more about AsyncAPI! The meeting is open to the public.

Agenda

Don't wait for the meeting to discuss topics that already have issues. Feel free to comment on them earlier.

  1. Q&A
  2. Awesome news from Google Summer of Code @derberg
  3. Release 2.1 prep status @derberg
  4. Intent-driven API discussion onboarding @jonaslagoni
  5. Place for your topic
  6. Q&A

Notes

  • Lukasz Gornicki provided an update on the AsyncAPI participation in Google Summer of Code. Thanks to Postman we got 5 spots, which means that next few months 5 amazing students will work with us on new libraries for AsyncAPI. To learn more about the ideas read this list or just stay tuned for an article with updates on what happened in May at AsyncAPI (rss feed)
  • Lukasz Gornicki provided an update on work towards 2.1 release. All work tracked here. Automation of release candidates' publish process is done. Automation of docs publishing to the website is in progress. Remember that if you have some proposal that is already there in the repo for few months, no objections from the community to get it into the spec, but you cannot champion it atm, feel free to share it in our Slack with our most active community, maybe there will be someone that can help out to push it through the process.
  • Jonas Lagon shared an overview of the discussion around intend-driven API and the current API design. We had a long discussion and explained well the core of the current issues with the API so this part of the meeting is a good kick-starter for you to join this discussion. We need you there!
  • Colin Sullivan from NATS project joined to talk about the current contributions of AsyncAPI to NATS and offered help. The most active project around NATS is TypeScript/Node.js NATS template and we definitely need help there, but there are also other areas, like the request/reply pattern discussion that is also interesting for NATS. The best is to join our Slack and discuss details there.

Recording

https://youtu.be/UCaDcQhDRIY

@derberg derberg pinned this issue May 25, 2021
@jonaslagoni
Copy link
Member

jonaslagoni commented May 25, 2021

In case we have nothing on the agenda and no questions, would it make sense to bring up this discussion @derberg ? I could prepare a 5 min presentation that lays out the dilemma.

@derberg
Copy link
Member Author

derberg commented May 25, 2021

@jonaslagoni go ahead! not many people joined the discussion yet and any activity that can change is most welcome.

@jonaslagoni
Copy link
Member

@jonaslagoni go ahead! not many people joined the discussion yet and any activity that can change is most welcome.

@derberg I will only focus on the discussion you and I have had in regards to why solve the perspective issue in the parser instead of solving it for the spec.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants