Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Request/reply discussion, 15:00 UTC Monday May 23rd 2022 #368

Closed
asyncapi-bot opened this issue May 16, 2022 · 3 comments
Closed

Request/reply discussion, 15:00 UTC Monday May 23rd 2022 #368

asyncapi-bot opened this issue May 16, 2022 · 3 comments
Labels

Comments

@asyncapi-bot
Copy link
Contributor

asyncapi-bot commented May 16, 2022

Meeting Info Details
Purpose Request and reply is a long outstanding feature request, this meeting is for discussing how not only to move forward, but also ways how to solve it. See more here: asyncapi/spec/issues/94
Time 15:00 UTC | Translate to your time zone with the time zone converter.
Meeting Place Link
Zoom Join live.
YouTube Watch live and interact through live chat.
Twitch Watch live.
Twitter Watch live.
LinkedIn Watch live.
More Info Details
Meeting Recordings Recording.
AsyncAPI Initiative Calendar Public URL.
iCal File Add to your calendar.
Newsletter Subscribe to get weekly updates on upcoming meetings.

Agenda

Don't wait for the meeting to discuss topics that already have issues. Feel free to comment on them earlier.

  1. Q&A
  2. Place for your topic
  3. Q&A

Notes

Add notes here after the meeting.

@jonaslagoni
Copy link
Member

jonaslagoni commented May 16, 2022

Following last meeting @GreenRover when you know where to pickup from last meeting feel free to ping me 🙂

@GreenRover
Copy link
Contributor

@jonaslagoni @fmvilas Here are the results of the todays discussion: asyncapi/spec#94 (comment)
Hopefully i was able to remember everything, if not please pm me.

I will lets this review some architects that i proxied. And maybe update the comment later.

Still open points:

correlationId
do we need it also as well defined field? As in async api v2: https://www.asyncapi.com/docs/specifications/v2.4.0#correlationIdObject
If yes here is the same problem, is it in body or header?
Or do we just say, it is part of the body and it should be best practice to put in the field description that the server needs to copy this to the response message.

@jonaslagoni
Copy link
Member

Recording is out: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ysa3xxxlUpk

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants