feat: add option to Csharp generator allowing user to generate records instead of classes #1191
Conversation
henrikjon
requested review from
ron-debajyoti,
magicmatatjahu,
jonaslagoni,
kennethaasan and
asyncapi-bot-eve
as code owners
✅ Deploy Preview for modelina ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site settings. |
![github-actions[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/15368?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Welcome to AsyncAPI. Thanks a lot for creating your first pull request. Please check out our contributors guide useful for opening a pull request.
Keep in mind there are also other channels you can use to interact with AsyncAPI community. For more details check out this issue.
|
Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!
|
henrikjon
changed the title
|
/rtm |
Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 4524262352
💛 - Coveralls |
|
🎉 This PR is included in version 1.3.0 🎉 The release is available on: Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀 |
|
@all-contributors please add @henrikjon for code, test, doc, example |
|
I've put up a pull request to add @henrikjon! 🎉 |
|
🎉 This PR is included in version 2.0.0-next.6 🎉 The release is available on: Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀 |
Description
This PR adds an option to the C# generator allowing it to render records instead of classes. This is done using a new renderer that implements
self,propertyandadditionalContenthooks. It does not support using theautoimplementedPropertiesas option as this is instead a default when generating records.Related issue(s)
Resolves #1153