Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Survey Question on the For loop in source file 02_capi_graph/src/algorithms/capi/betweennessCentrality.c line 158 #1

Open
LChenGit opened this issue Jun 29, 2022 · 0 comments

Comments

@LChenGit
Copy link

Hello Sir/ Madam
We are from a research group at Iowa State University, USA. We want to do a survey on Github developers on the methods they used for paralleling their code. To do the survey, We want to ask three questions:

  1. Have you ever tried to add pragma for that 'for' loop?.

  2. How much confidence do you have about the correctness of this implementation? You can choose from 1-5 with 1 as the lowest confidence score and 5 as the highest confidence.

  3. (Optional) Do you actually run (interpret the code with compilation and pass input/get output) the code? Yes/No

  • If yes, can you provide the information of what are the input and expected output of this program (the input that caused the program to run through this for-loop).

The for loop is from line 158 of file https:/github.com/atmughrabi/AccelGraph/blob/master/02_capi_graph/src/algorithms/capi/betweennessCentrality.c
Here is a part of the code:

nan
for (i = 0; i < stats->num_vertices; i++)
{
free(stats->predecessors[i].nodes);
}

Sincerely thanks

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant