You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We don't allow layouts to be under-specified for now. E.g., a Bool type can't be larger than 1 bit. This design simplifies C code generation a lot, and also makes sense, as you really don't need more space than necessary to store anything. Variant tags are not currently checked for under-specification. They can be larger than necessary; this is just a thing we haven't implemented in the typechecker, and should be relatively easy to add.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
We don't allow layouts to be under-specified for now. E.g., a Bool type can't be larger than 1 bit. This design simplifies C code generation a lot, and also makes sense, as you really don't need more space than necessary to store anything. Variant tags are not currently checked for under-specification. They can be larger than necessary; this is just a thing we haven't implemented in the typechecker, and should be relatively easy to add.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: