Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

get_surface_sliding vs get_surface_occupancy #297

Open
iszihan opened this issue Mar 8, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

get_surface_sliding vs get_surface_occupancy #297

iszihan opened this issue Mar 8, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@iszihan
Copy link

iszihan commented Mar 8, 2024

Just curious what's the main difference between get_surface_sliding and get_surface_occupancy? I know that the latter one uses a level set value of 0.5 because it is extracting a mesh from an occupancy network. But can I also just use get_surface_sliding with a level set value of 0.5 for occupancy based network like unisurf?

@niujinshuchong
Copy link
Member

Hi, get_surface_sliding use multi-scale strategy to skip empty space since if sdf is very large, it means a large region centred at this point is empty. However, occupancy only have the inside outside information, the multi-scale strategy might not work well.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants