Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Website #162

Closed
sindresorhus opened this issue Nov 8, 2015 · 15 comments
Closed

Website #162

sindresorhus opened this issue Nov 8, 2015 · 15 comments

Comments

@sindresorhus
Copy link
Member

This is just to gather ideas. Not going to do a website until after AVA 1.0.0, as we want to focus on AVA itself, not marketing.

@sindresorhus sindresorhus added this to the Future milestone Nov 8, 2015
@sindresorhus
Copy link
Member Author

Would be nice to embed the Gitter chat on the website: https://sidecar.gitter.im

@vadimdemedes
Copy link
Contributor

How about a live code playground?

@sindresorhus
Copy link
Member Author

@vdemedes How would it work exactly? Not sure I understand the purpose.

@vadimdemedes
Copy link
Contributor

@sindresorhus We'd have a text editor on the left side and live output (result of running ava) on the right side. That way we could demonstrate our nice stuff, like super dope assertions.

@vadimdemedes
Copy link
Contributor

Although we'd need AVA to have support for browsers.

@sindresorhus
Copy link
Member Author

Oh yeah, that would be cool. We'll have browser support by the time we do a website anyways.

@Qix-
Copy link
Contributor

Qix- commented Nov 8, 2015

I don't think a live editor will help since this is a test framework. What would you have to test? Make sure to attach everything to analytics to see what's actually being used. 👍

@sindresorhus
Copy link
Member Author

@Qix- Just to give the user a feel of how nice and simple the test syntax is and what the output will look like.

@sotojuan
Copy link
Contributor

sotojuan commented Nov 8, 2015

The main thing I can think of is lots of examples for different kinds of tests. Simple assertions, testing promises/async, testing APIs, etc. Not too many (overwhelming users is bad), but examples help newbies a lot. They don't have to be interactive, just the code and what the output would be.

@kentcdodds
Copy link
Contributor

When you've got the website up, if you wanna have a listing for users, you can add PayPal to that list. We're happily using it as of today :-) PayPal.svg

@jamestalmage
Copy link
Contributor

@kentcdodds - That's awesome news!

@denar90
Copy link

denar90 commented Jun 4, 2016

Hi guys. Talking about site. It can have pages generated form docs and pages with some content, like authors, links to some resources, compare stuff etc. So I propose to build all stuff using grunt/gulp etc. Build tool will grab all content and make html from it, would it be doc file or jade or whatever.
So site can consist of pages like

  • main page (why AVA, AVA vs other, contributors)
  • sources/plugins
  • docs
  • examples
  • changelog
    What do you think guys?
    Also what do you think about creating repo in AVA org where issues can be created? Eg. I can prepare some PR's and issues while core team is busy with v1. Someone from core team can from time to time look at it.

@novemberborn novemberborn removed this from the Future milestone Aug 13, 2017
@yowainwright
Copy link

yowainwright commented Sep 1, 2017

@novemberborn could I get insight into the website priority from the Ava team?

I'm finding the readme/docs folder to be difficult to navigate for myself—although the documentation is clear. 🙏

Is there a way to better navigate Ava's readme and docs folder that I'm not aware of?

@novemberborn
Copy link
Member

@yowainwright still not a priority until we ship a 1.0 release. We do need to reorganize the documentation though, I think mostly by splitting it out from the main README. You might be interested in the discussion in #1454.

@novemberborn
Copy link
Member

Closing this until we're in a place where we'd want a website.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

9 participants