Feature request: allow BaseProvider
in Parameters to not have a client
#2400
Labels
discussing
The issue needs to be discussed, elaborated, or refined
feature-request
This item refers to a feature request for an existing or new utility
parameters
This item relates to the Parameters Utility
Use case
When creating a custom Parameters provider I should be able to seamless set my own backend, regardless of whether this might be AWS, a 3rd party, or anything else.
Currently the
BaseProvider
expects a constructor parameter calledproto
(as-in prototype, bad name) that you're supposed to pass and that will be used whenever you are not passing an AWS SDK client.This implementation is too tightly coupled with the notion that
BaseProvider
expects to be extended by a provider that relies on an AWS SDK client. This is not always the case, and as a customer implementing my own provider I should not have to work around this limitation.Solution/User Experience
For end customers using the Parameters utility as-is, the experience should stay the same.
For those other customers who implement their own provider, the implementation should be simpler and not require to pass a class prototype to be instantiated as client.
Alternative solutions
No response
Acknowledgment
Future readers
Please react with 👍 and your use case to help us understand customer demand.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: