Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

CDK environment setup for platform/system administrators #419

Closed
4 of 11 tasks
skinny85 opened this issue Apr 13, 2022 · 3 comments
Closed
4 of 11 tasks

CDK environment setup for platform/system administrators #419

skinny85 opened this issue Apr 13, 2022 · 3 comments
Assignees
Labels
bar-raiser/assigned management/tracking status/stale The RFC did not get any significant enough progress or tracking and has become stale.

Comments

@skinny85
Copy link
Contributor

skinny85 commented Apr 13, 2022

Description

CDK is tricky to use in restricted environments where there is a split between the platform/system administrator teams, and the application development teams who use CDK.

This RFC proposes a set of features for dealing with that problem.

Roles

Role User
Proposed by @skinny85
Author(s) @skinny85
API Bar Raiser @rix0rrr
Stakeholders @cgarvis, @addihorowitz, @rix0rrr

See RFC Process for details

Workflow

  • Tracking issue created (label: status/proposed)
  • API bar raiser assigned (ping us at #aws-cdk-rfcs if needed)
  • Kick off meeting
  • RFC pull request submitted (label: status/review)
  • Community reach out (via Slack and/or Twitter)
  • API signed-off (label api-approved applied to pull request)
  • Final comments period (label: status/final-comments-period)
  • Approved and merged (label: status/approved)
  • Execution plan submitted (label: status/planning)
  • Plan approved and merged (label: status/implementing)
  • Implementation complete (label: status/done)

Author is responsible to progress the RFC according to this checklist, and
apply the relevant labels to this issue so that the RFC table in README gets
updated.

@skinny85
Copy link
Contributor Author

@rix0rrr I've assigned you as the API bar raiser on this one, let me know if you disagree.

@skinny85
Copy link
Contributor Author

Pull Request with the RFC: #421.

@skinny85 skinny85 added status/review Proposal pending review/revision and removed status/proposed Newly proposed RFC labels Apr 13, 2022
@mrgrain
Copy link
Contributor

mrgrain commented Nov 3, 2023

Marking this RFCs as stale since there has been little recent activity and it is not currently close to getting accepted as-is. We appreciate the effort that has gone into this proposal. Marking an RFCs as stale is not a one-way door. If you have made substantial changes to the proposal, please open a new issue/RFC. You might also consider raising a PR to aws/aws-cdk directly or self-publishing to Construct Hub.

@mrgrain mrgrain closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale Nov 3, 2023
@mrgrain mrgrain added status/stale The RFC did not get any significant enough progress or tracking and has become stale. and removed status/review Proposal pending review/revision labels Nov 3, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bar-raiser/assigned management/tracking status/stale The RFC did not get any significant enough progress or tracking and has become stale.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants