Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(batch): add secrets props to job definition #20871

Merged
merged 15 commits into from
Jul 5, 2022

Conversation

yoshizawa56
Copy link
Contributor

@yoshizawa56 yoshizawa56 commented Jun 25, 2022

Add a secrets property to batch.JobDefinitionContainer. This interface is almost the same as ecs.ContainerDefinitionOptions.

This is reopen PR of #19506

closes #10976


All Submissions:

Adding new Unconventional Dependencies:

  • This PR adds new unconventional dependencies following the process described here

New Features

  • Have you added the new feature to an integration test?
    • Did you use yarn integ to deploy the infrastructure and generate the snapshot (i.e. yarn integ without --dry-run)?

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache-2.0 license

@gitpod-io
Copy link

gitpod-io bot commented Jun 25, 2022

@github-actions github-actions bot added effort/medium Medium work item – several days of effort feature-request A feature should be added or improved. p1 labels Jun 25, 2022
@aws-cdk-automation aws-cdk-automation requested a review from a team June 25, 2022 08:29
Copy link
Contributor

@kaizencc kaizencc left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi @yoshizawa56! Is this the same PR that was previously abandoned (by us, sorry)? If so, can you link to that in the PR description as well as provide a summary of what's in this PR, also in the description. I'll make sure this one gets reviewed promptly.

@kaizencc kaizencc self-assigned this Jun 27, 2022
@yoshizawa56
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hi @kaizencc ! Thanks for commnet!
This is the same PR as previous one(#19506). I edited the summary.

Copy link
Contributor

@kaizencc kaizencc left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@yoshizawa56 one minor thing. Otherwise this looks great!

@@ -0,0 +1,1874 @@
{
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm 90% sure that this file is not needed and shouldn't be a part of this PR. expected.json files are a relic of our legacy integration test system which are now replaced by the batch.integ.snapshot folder. I am not sure why/how this file was created, but I suspect it has something to do with the initial PR (from March) coming before we introduced the new integ system.

Can you please delete this file and then run yarn integ in your batch folder again? This file should not get created and that will verify what I'm saying is true.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You are correct. I delete expected.json and re-ran yarn integ and it passed the test!

@mergify mergify bot dismissed kaizencc’s stale review June 30, 2022 22:51

Pull request has been modified.

kaizencc
kaizencc previously approved these changes Jul 1, 2022
Copy link
Contributor

@kaizencc kaizencc left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Awesome work @yoshizawa56! Thanks for the PR.

packages/@aws-cdk/aws-batch/README.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@mergify mergify bot dismissed kaizencc’s stale review July 1, 2022 13:38

Pull request has been modified.

@mergify
Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented Jul 5, 2022

Thank you for contributing! Your pull request will be updated from main and then merged automatically (do not update manually, and be sure to allow changes to be pushed to your fork).

@mergify mergify bot merged commit 9b1051f into aws:main Jul 5, 2022
@mergify
Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented Jul 5, 2022

Thank you for contributing! Your pull request will be updated from main and then merged automatically (do not update manually, and be sure to allow changes to be pushed to your fork).

@aws-cdk-automation
Copy link
Collaborator

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

  • CodeBuild project: AutoBuildv2Project1C6BFA3F-wQm2hXv2jqQv
  • Commit ID: df24128
  • Result: SUCCEEDED
  • Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

daschaa pushed a commit to daschaa/aws-cdk that referenced this pull request Jul 9, 2022
Add a secrets property to batch.JobDefinitionContainer. This interface is almost the same as ecs.ContainerDefinitionOptions.

This is reopen PR of aws#19506

closes aws#10976

----

### All Submissions:

* [x] Have you followed the guidelines in our [Contributing guide?](https://github.com/aws/aws-cdk/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md)

### Adding new Unconventional Dependencies:

* [ ] This PR adds new unconventional dependencies following the process described [here](https://github.com/aws/aws-cdk/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md/#adding-new-unconventional-dependencies)

### New Features

* [x] Have you added the new feature to an [integration test](https://github.com/aws/aws-cdk/blob/main/INTEGRATION_TESTS.md)?
	* [x] Did you use `yarn integ` to deploy the infrastructure and generate the snapshot (i.e. `yarn integ` without `--dry-run`)?

*By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache-2.0 license*
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
effort/medium Medium work item – several days of effort feature-request A feature should be added or improved. p1
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Batch] Add "Secrets" properties in interface JobDefinitionContainer
3 participants