Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(codegen): support malformed request tests #2695

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 26, 2021

Conversation

JordonPhillips
Copy link
Member

Issue

n/a

Description

This adds suppressions for a number of malformed request tests which are known to fail currently.

Testing

Built main on the smithy repo and ran the malformed request tests.

Additional context

Malformed request tests exist for testing the SSDK against requests that should be rejected by virtue of being malformed in some way. For instance, there are a number of tests asserting strict timestamp handling behavior that isn't implemented yet.

The tests in question are still awaiting release in the next version of Smithy, but since the actual traits and supporting infrastructure were released in 1.11.0 we can do this now so that upgrading the code generator to the next version of Smithy is painless.


By submitting this pull request, I confirm that you can use, modify, copy, and redistribute this contribution, under the terms of your choice.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Aug 20, 2021

Codecov Report

❗ No coverage uploaded for pull request base (main@88de69b). Click here to learn what that means.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #2695   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage        ?   61.30%           
=======================================
  Files           ?      537           
  Lines           ?    27446           
  Branches        ?     6698           
=======================================
  Hits            ?    16827           
  Misses          ?    10619           
  Partials        ?        0           

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 88de69b...f8cd27c. Read the comment docs.

@JordonPhillips
Copy link
Member Author

Is main failing? iirc that codebuild test only runs the already-generated TS code, which this doesn't touch

@github-actions
Copy link

This thread has been automatically locked since there has not been any recent activity after it was closed. Please open a new issue for related bugs and link to relevant comments in this thread.

@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 10, 2021
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants