Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Toolkit: ActionGroup should be registered using <group> tag #5012

Open
rli opened this issue Oct 25, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Toolkit: ActionGroup should be registered using <group> tag #5012

rli opened this issue Oct 25, 2024 · 0 comments
Labels
bug We can reproduce the issue and confirmed it is a bug.

Comments

@rli
Copy link
Contributor

rli commented Oct 25, 2024

v3.34

com.intellij.diagnostic.PluginException: ActionGroup should be registered using <group> tag: id="aws.toolkit.dynamoViewer.changeMaxResults" class="software.aws.toolkits.jetbrains.services.dynamodb.editor.actions.ConfigureMaxResultsAction" [Plugin: aws.toolkit]
	at com.intellij.openapi.actionSystem.ActionStub.initAction(ActionStub.java:108)
	at com.intellij.openapi.actionSystem.impl.ActionManagerImplKt.convertStub(ActionManagerImpl.kt:1696)
	at com.intellij.openapi.actionSystem.impl.ActionManagerImplKt.getAction(ActionManagerImpl.kt:2173)
	at com.intellij.openapi.actionSystem.impl.ActionManagerImplKt.access$getAction(ActionManagerImpl.kt:1)
	at com.intellij.openapi.actionSystem.impl.ActionManagerImpl.getAction(ActionManagerImpl.kt:411)
	at com.intellij.ide.util.gotoByName.ActionAsyncProvider$loadAction$2.invokeSuspend(ActionAsyncProvider.kt:378)
	at com.intellij.ide.util.gotoByName.ActionAsyncProvider$loadAction$2.invoke(ActionAsyncProvider.kt)
	at com.intellij.ide.util.gotoByName.ActionAsyncProvider$loadAction$2.invoke(ActionAsyncProvider.kt)
	at kotlinx.coroutines.intrinsics.UndispatchedKt.startUndispatchedOrReturn(Undispatched.kt:62)
	at kotlinx.coroutines.BuildersKt__Builders_commonKt.withContext(Builders.common.kt:163)
	at kotlinx.coroutines.BuildersKt.withContext(Unknown Source)
	at com.intellij.ide.util.gotoByName.ActionAsyncProvider.loadAction(ActionAsyncProvider.kt:377)
	at com.intellij.ide.util.gotoByName.ActionAsyncProvider.access$loadAction(ActionAsyncProvider.kt:35)
	at com.intellij.ide.util.gotoByName.ActionAsyncProvider$unmatchedStubsFlow$$inlined$transform$1$1.emit(Emitters.kt:220)
	at com.intellij.ide.util.gotoByName.ActionAsyncProvider$unmatchedStubsFlow$$inlined$filter$1$2.emit(Emitters.kt:219)
	at com.intellij.ide.util.gotoByName.ActionAsyncProvider$unmatchedStubsFlow$$inlined$mapNotNull$1$2.emit(Emitters.kt:223)
	at kotlinx.coroutines.flow.FlowKt__BuildersKt$asFlow$$inlined$unsafeFlow$3.collect(SafeCollector.common.kt:114)
	at com.intellij.ide.util.gotoByName.ActionAsyncProvider$unmatchedStubsFlow$$inlined$mapNotNull$1.collect(SafeCollector.common.kt:112)
	at com.intellij.ide.util.gotoByName.ActionAsyncProvider$unmatchedStubsFlow$$inlined$filter$1.collect(SafeCollector.common.kt:112)
	at com.intellij.ide.util.gotoByName.ActionAsyncProvider$unmatchedStubsFlow$$inlined$transform$1.invokeSuspend(Emitters.kt:36)
	at com.intellij.ide.util.gotoByName.ActionAsyncProvider$unmatchedStubsFlow$$inlined$transform$1.invoke(Emitters.kt)
	at com.intellij.ide.util.gotoByName.ActionAsyncProvider$unmatchedStubsFlow$$inlined$transform$1.invoke(Emitters.kt)
	at kotlinx.coroutines.flow.SafeFlow.collectSafely(Builders.kt:57)
	at kotlinx.coroutines.flow.AbstractFlow.collect(Flow.kt:226)
	at kotlinx.coroutines.flow.internal.ChannelFlowOperatorImpl.flowCollect(ChannelFlow.kt:191)
	at kotlinx.coroutines.flow.internal.ChannelFlowOperator.collectTo$suspendImpl(ChannelFlow.kt:153)
	at kotlinx.coroutines.flow.internal.ChannelFlowOperator.collectTo(ChannelFlow.kt)
	at kotlinx.coroutines.flow.internal.ChannelFlow$collectToFun$1.invokeSuspend(ChannelFlow.kt:56)
	at kotlin.coroutines.jvm.internal.BaseContinuationImpl.resumeWith(ContinuationImpl.kt:33)
	at kotlinx.coroutines.DispatchedTask.run(DispatchedTask.kt:104)
	at kotlinx.coroutines.internal.LimitedDispatcher$Worker.run(LimitedDispatcher.kt:111)
	at kotlinx.coroutines.scheduling.TaskImpl.run(Tasks.kt:99)
	at kotlinx.coroutines.scheduling.CoroutineScheduler.runSafely(CoroutineScheduler.kt:608)
	at kotlinx.coroutines.scheduling.CoroutineScheduler$Worker.executeTask(CoroutineScheduler.kt:873)
	at kotlinx.coroutines.scheduling.CoroutineScheduler$Worker.runWorker(CoroutineScheduler.kt:763)
	at kotlinx.coroutines.scheduling.CoroutineScheduler$Worker.run(CoroutineScheduler.kt:750)

@rli rli added the bug We can reproduce the issue and confirmed it is a bug. label Oct 25, 2024
@rli rli changed the title ActionGroup should be registered using <group> tag Toolkit: ActionGroup should be registered using <group> tag Oct 25, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug We can reproduce the issue and confirmed it is a bug.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant