Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

model-server-worker fails without "optional" arguments #909

Open
johncolby opened this issue Apr 24, 2020 · 1 comment · May be fixed by #910
Open

model-server-worker fails without "optional" arguments #909

johncolby opened this issue Apr 24, 2020 · 1 comment · May be fixed by #910

Comments

@johncolby
Copy link

Small bug in model-server-worker, which fails if the optional arguments handler, model-path, or model-name are not provided.

docstring:

Usage: model-server-worker [-h] --sock-type {unix,tcp} [--sock-name SOCK_NAME]
                           [--host HOST] [--port PORT] [--handler HANDLER]
                           [--model-path MODEL_PATH] [--model-name MODEL_NAME]
                           --preload-model PRELOAD_MODEL --tmp-dir TMP_DIR

When debugging custom service code, I usually invoke the model-server-worker manually like:

python model_service_worker.py --sock-type unix --sock-name /tmp/.mms.sock.9000 --preload-model false --tmp-dir /tmp

However, this fails under 1.1.0 due to the recent addition of the following argument encoding code, which fails when any of these arguments are None type:

model_req["handler"] = args.handler.encode('utf-8')
model_req["modelPath"] = args.model_path.encode('utf-8')
model_req["modelName"] = args.model_name.encode('utf-8')

johncolby added a commit to johncolby/multi-model-server that referenced this issue Apr 24, 2020
@johncolby
Copy link
Author

@alexgl-github Maybe can review wrt to your recent updates? thx.

@johncolby johncolby linked a pull request Apr 24, 2020 that will close this issue
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
1 participant