You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The documentation describes how to select dielectric interfaces for postprocessing boundaries. However, there isn't an option to select both sides of an internal boundary using "Side" (i.e., what happens when the dielectric constants are equal?).
A simple example is a suspended piece of metal in air. There are metal-air interfaces ("MA") on both sides of the metal, but "Side" only allows selecting the "SmallerRefractiveIndex" or "LargerRefractiveIndex". Also in the general case, there is no guarantee that the loss tangents on either side will be the same, so simply summing the contributions from both sides might be insufficient for all users.
The code to for side selection for the internal dielectric interface is here.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The documentation describes how to select dielectric interfaces for postprocessing boundaries. However, there isn't an option to select both sides of an internal boundary using
"Side"
(i.e., what happens when the dielectric constants are equal?).A simple example is a suspended piece of metal in air. There are metal-air interfaces (
"MA"
) on both sides of the metal, but"Side"
only allows selecting the"SmallerRefractiveIndex"
or"LargerRefractiveIndex"
. Also in the general case, there is no guarantee that the loss tangents on either side will be the same, so simply summing the contributions from both sides might be insufficient for all users.The code to for side selection for the internal dielectric interface is here.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: