Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

implementation of inlined operation input / output shapes #963

Merged

Conversation

JordonPhillips
Copy link
Contributor

@JordonPhillips JordonPhillips commented Oct 27, 2021

This is an implementation of: #962

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.

@JordonPhillips JordonPhillips marked this pull request as ready for review November 5, 2021 14:41
@JordonPhillips JordonPhillips requested a review from a team as a code owner November 5, 2021 14:41
This adds support for inline definitions of operation input and
output shapes. This somewhat reduces necessary boilerplate, and
makes the model a bit easier to read since the high level info
for an operation is now all in one place.

This also updates the IDL serializer to use inlined shapes
wherever possible.
@JordonPhillips JordonPhillips merged commit 60545f7 into smithy-lang:idl-2.0 Dec 8, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants