Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[GitHub Actions] "invalid response data" for pending jobs #8716

Closed
kevinoid opened this issue Dec 15, 2022 · 2 comments · Fixed by #8717
Closed

[GitHub Actions] "invalid response data" for pending jobs #8716

kevinoid opened this issue Dec 15, 2022 · 2 comments · Fixed by #8717
Labels
bug Bugs in badges and the frontend service-badge Accepted and actionable changes, features, and bugs

Comments

@kevinoid
Copy link
Contributor

Are you experiencing an issue with...

shields.io

🐞 Description

After switching to the new route for GitHub Actions workflows, as described in #8671 , the badge shows "invalid response data" when the workflow is running, rather than "running" or "pending" or a more informative status.

🔗 Link to the badge

https://img.shields.io/github/actions/workflow/status/kevinoid/example-slow-workflow/ci.yml?branch=main

💡 Possible Solution

No response

@kevinoid kevinoid added the question Support questions, usage questions, unconfirmed bugs, discussions, ideas label Dec 15, 2022
@chris48s chris48s added bug Bugs in badges and the frontend service-badge Accepted and actionable changes, features, and bugs and removed question Support questions, usage questions, unconfirmed bugs, discussions, ideas labels Dec 15, 2022
@chris48s
Copy link
Member

PR up for review from another maintainer #8717

@kevinoid
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks for the fast fix @chris48s!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Bugs in badges and the frontend service-badge Accepted and actionable changes, features, and bugs
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants