Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

XML attribute access is Lax #21102

Closed
rdhananjaya opened this issue Feb 17, 2020 · 1 comment
Closed

XML attribute access is Lax #21102

rdhananjaya opened this issue Feb 17, 2020 · 1 comment
Assignees
@rdhananjaya
Labels
Points/4 Equivalent to four day effort Team/CompilerFE All issues related to Language implementation and Compiler, this exclude run times. Type/NewFeature
Milestone
Ballerina 1.2.0

Comments

@rdhananjaya
Copy link
Member

Description:
We need to support Lax typing for XML as well, the reason is according to nex XML proposal, attribute access (doe via field access) is Lax.

Steps to reproduce:

Affected Versions:

OS, DB, other environment details and versions:

Related Issues (optional):

Suggested Labels (optional):

Suggested Assignees (optional):
@rdhananjaya rdhananjaya added this to the Ballerina 1.2.0 milestone Feb 17, 2020
@rdhananjaya rdhananjaya self-assigned this Feb 17, 2020
@hasithaa hasithaa mentioned this issue Feb 17, 2020
Closed
23 tasks
@rdhananjaya rdhananjaya added Team/CompilerFE All issues related to Language implementation and Compiler, this exclude run times. Type/NewFeature labels Feb 18, 2020
@KavinduZoysa KavinduZoysa added the Points/4 Equivalent to four day effort label Feb 28, 2020
@rdhananjaya
Copy link
Member Author

Fixed with #21344

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@rdhananjaya rdhananjaya

Labels
Points/4 Equivalent to four day effort Team/CompilerFE All issues related to Language implementation and Compiler, this exclude run times. Type/NewFeature
Projects
None yet
Milestone
Ballerina 1.2.0
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@rdhananjaya @KavinduZoysa