You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
When viewed in e.g. baltrad-viewer the detectability field seems inverted i.e. areas with high poo is transparent and areas with low, or no poo, is coloured gray, this is inverted relative e.g. fields for bropo (anomalies) and beamb (blockage).
It needs to be investigated how gain and offset is used for rave-overshooting (poo). For polar scan gain = -0.00392156862745098 and offset = 1.0, while for cartesian data, gain = 0.00392156862745098 and offset = 0. It might be so from "historical" reasons, what's important is that the code reading the products can handle it correctly.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
When viewed in e.g. baltrad-viewer the detectability field seems inverted i.e. areas with high poo is transparent and areas with low, or no poo, is coloured gray, this is inverted relative e.g. fields for bropo (anomalies) and beamb (blockage).
It needs to be investigated how gain and offset is used for rave-overshooting (poo). For polar scan gain = -0.00392156862745098 and offset = 1.0, while for cartesian data, gain = 0.00392156862745098 and offset = 0. It might be so from "historical" reasons, what's important is that the code reading the products can handle it correctly.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: