Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

--strict breaks on Linux with Bazel 0.24.1 #47

Open
ejona86 opened this issue Apr 4, 2019 · 2 comments
Open

--strict breaks on Linux with Bazel 0.24.1 #47

ejona86 opened this issue Apr 4, 2019 · 2 comments
Labels
help wanted Needs help from external contributors P3 We're not considering working on this, but happy to review a PR. (No assignee) type: feature request New feature or request

Comments

@ejona86
Copy link

ejona86 commented Apr 4, 2019

$ USE_BAZEL_VERSION=0.24.1 ../bazelisk-linux-amd64 --strict build ...
ERROR: Unrecognized option: --incompatible_windows_style_arg_escaping

bazelbuild/bazel#7454 is marked for migration. I assume the unrecognized option is because the flag is windows-only.

@philwo
Copy link
Member

philwo commented Jun 4, 2019

The problem was that the flag is a startup flag, but Bazelisk doesn't understand that (granted, there's also no way to know that from looking at the issue), so it tried to pass it as a normal flag, which caused Bazel to fail.

We'll have to somehow add a signal to the issues so that Bazelisk knows where to put the flag. Luckily, incompatible startup flags should be very rare.

@philwo philwo added the help wanted Needs help from external contributors label Jun 19, 2019
@fweikert fweikert added P3 We're not considering working on this, but happy to review a PR. (No assignee) type: feature request New feature or request labels Feb 6, 2024
@albertocavalcante
Copy link
Contributor

Is this still an issue that needs help? I must confess the requirement is not totally clear to me.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
help wanted Needs help from external contributors P3 We're not considering working on this, but happy to review a PR. (No assignee) type: feature request New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants