Add Support for Multi-Arch and Multi-Platform Images

[jeremyje]

It's currently not possible to use docker manifest and docker buildx to build multi-arch and multi-platform images. This is necessary if you're targeting multiple architectures (amd64, arm64, etc.) as well as multiple operating systems, (linux, windows_2004, windows_1909, etc). Windows here is interesting in that there's strict host compatibility requirements.

https://www.docker.com/blog/multi-arch-build-and-images-the-simple-way/

[excavador]

Hello!

Any progress? I really want to see bazel way to build multi-arch and multi-platform images. It would simplify so much our kubernetes configuration

[github-actions]

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had any activity for 180 days. It will be closed if no further activity occurs in 30 days.
Collaborators can add an assignee to keep this open indefinitely. Thanks for your contributions to rules_docker!

[excavador]

Any updates?

[excavador]

Any updates?

[jonjohnsonjr]

Somewhat blocked on bazelbuild/bazel#6519

Some discussion in #300

I've got ideas in #1695 (comment) but need some guidance re: the rules UX.

[github-actions]

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had any activity for 180 days. It will be closed if no further activity occurs in 30 days.
Collaborators can add an assignee to keep this open indefinitely. Thanks for your contributions to rules_docker!

[wenerme]

keep is open

[jwillker]

I have this necessity today.

[xuzhenglun]

any update?

[ghost]

The pull request to support fat manifest is ready since 3 months >>> #2087

[loeffel-io]

+1

[manan]

+1

[farcop]

+1

[twarnock]

+1

[loeffel-io]

+++++

[friendly-pineapple]

+999

[dlshle]

while (true) +

[loeffel-io]

while (true) +

😂

[ramilmsh]

[avbhandaru]

👀

[ofey404]

+1