Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Pipfile support? #72

Closed
alecbz opened this issue Mar 2, 2018 · 2 comments
Closed

Pipfile support? #72

alecbz opened this issue Mar 2, 2018 · 2 comments
Assignees

Comments

@alecbz
Copy link

alecbz commented Mar 2, 2018

Probably not an immediate priority, but it may be worth considering how/when to support the new 'Pipfile' format in addition to requirements.txt

@thedrow
Copy link

thedrow commented Aug 23, 2018

requirementslib can help us reuse the same code that imports requirements files since the library can convert Pipfile/Pipfile.lock files into requirements.txt files.

@thundergolfer
Copy link
Collaborator

Given the presence of Pipenv, Poetry, and pip-tools with their respective Pipfile[.lock], pyproject.toml, and requirements.in files, the Python packaging ecosystem is not close to having a useful consensus towards Pipenv on which we could justify adding Pipfile support.

I will close this issue for now.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants