-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 58
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Edit NR - User can input the third choice without input the second choice #19690
Labels
Comments
mengdong19
added
bug
Something isn't working
Name Request
Names Team
Name Request Name Examination Team
labels
Feb 5, 2024
I feel like even thought the impact is minimal it's important to have the names entered in sequential order, because the examiner is likely to think that there is a "missing" second choice which will lead to unnecessary back and forth with client. |
This was referenced Feb 9, 2024
Ready to test in TEST and DEV environment |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
Describe the bug in current situation
For NR with no designation types, when user edit NR, they are able to input the third choice without input the second choice and save.
Link bug to the User Story
Impact of this bug
Checked the number of NRs that has third option but does not have second option is 3198, about 0.31%
Chance of Occurring (high/medium/low/very low)
Low
Pre Conditions: which Env, any pre-requesites or assumptions to execute steps?
Test site
Steps to Reproduce
Steps to reproduce the behavior:
Actual/ observed behavior/ results
NR was updated without 2nd choice.
Expected behavior
User should not be able to input third choice without second choice, just like editing other type of NRs.
Screenshots/ Visual Reference/ Source
Expected:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: