New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Technical debt - review use of Pipenv #177

Closed

2 tasks done

Sybrand opened this issue Mar 23, 2020 · 0 comments

Assignees

Labels

Task

Milestone

Sprint 9: TBD by BEN

Contributor

Sybrand commented Mar 23, 2020 •

edited

Loading

Describe the task
Pipenv may not be the best choice for package management and virtual environment management. Review alternatives.

Acceptance Criteria

Alternatives reviewed (e.g. poetry, hand rolled requirements.txt, pip-tools)
Alternative proposed, or decision to stick with Pipenv

Additional context

There is some debate about wether Pipenv is "dead": If this project is dead, just tell us pypa/pipenv#4058
There is some debate about using it all: https://medium.com/telnyx-engineering/rip-pipenv-tried-too-hard-do-what-you-need-with-pip-tools-d500edc161d4

Sybrand added the Task label

jakemorr added the Recommended label

Sybrand self-assigned this

Sybrand closed this as completed

jakemorr added this to the Sprint 9: TBD by BEN milestone

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment