Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

"ß" has a very unusual shape #141

Closed
p-e-w opened this issue Jan 15, 2017 · 7 comments
Closed

"ß" has a very unusual shape #141

p-e-w opened this issue Jan 15, 2017 · 7 comments

Comments

@p-e-w
Copy link

p-e-w commented Jan 15, 2017

(Iosevka 1.10.4)

The current design of the Eszett (ß) glyph is quite unusual for a modern typeface, to the point where I feel it disturbs the flow of reading text. It resembles a Fraktur ß and reminds me of decades-old street signs:

(Image source)

The following is now considered the "standard form" of ß, and is found in every other non-decorative font I've ever used:

(Image source)

This glyph form is also less dense and I believe would fit better with the rest of Iosevka.

@be5invis
Copy link
Owner

Merged into #140. Closed.

@be5invis
Copy link
Owner

Added (-> cv35). Traditional eszet is assigned into cv34.

@eiszfuchs
Copy link
Contributor

D'oh! Is cv34 default? I liked the ligature look, as it makes it easier to distinguish from the letter "B". Also, personal preference, that was the main reason I was hooked for Iosevka.

@be5invis
Copy link
Owner

@eiszfuchs You can make a custom build with design=v-eszet-traditional

@eiszfuchs
Copy link
Contributor

I had issues compiling Iosevka when working on the Braille Pull request. For some reason, fonts appeared aliased and unhinted. 🤔

@be5invis
Copy link
Owner

@eiszfuchs The build script has been completely rewritten, no longer depends on FF.

@eiszfuchs
Copy link
Contributor

OOooOOOooo! Gotta try that out. Thanks for the notice! 😍

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants