Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Do we keep WL1835 or move to WL1831? #39

Open
jadonk opened this issue Jun 9, 2020 · 2 comments
Open

Do we keep WL1835 or move to WL1831? #39

jadonk opened this issue Jun 9, 2020 · 2 comments
Labels
fix-in-rev-c

Comments

@jadonk
Copy link
Member

jadonk commented Jun 9, 2020

Migrated from jadonk#30
Originally created by @jadonk on Wed, 12 Oct 2016 21:08:39 GMT
@jadonk jadonk mentioned this issue Jun 9, 2020
Closed
@jadonk jadonk removed the from-jadonk label Jun 9, 2020
@jadonk
Copy link
Member Author

jadonk commented Jun 17, 2020

For rev C, I'd suggest moving to WL1807, dropping Bluetooth and adding 5GHz. Unsure on availability.

@dorovl
Copy link

dorovl commented Jun 17, 2020

For rev C, I'd suggest moving to WL1807, dropping Bluetooth and adding 5GHz. Unsure on availability.

Hi @jadonk I'm using Bluetooth to communicate with deceives like Arduinos having a simple Bluetooth modem (for telemetry purposes). For me, dropping Bluetooth would be a little regrettable because I should to add more wires also level sifters (3.3V ↔ 5V) for the UARTs.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
fix-in-rev-c
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@jadonk @dorovl