You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Oct 14, 2022. It is now read-only.
The following happened with me that made me rethink several assumptions of beaker & hashbase:
I added an archive to hashbase by mistake.
I removed it hastily from hashbase.
I also deleted the archive in beaker (but didn't remove it from trash).
Surprisingly, I found in my hashbase's profile the public key of the removed archive in Recent Activity.
When I tried the key in a dat url, it worked!
Several user assumptions that have been broken by beaker & hashbase, in my opinion:
Beaker: Deleting an archive stops seeding it even if not removed from trash yet.
Hashbase: Removing an archive removes everything hashbase knows about the archive.
Hashbase: Actually, I don't remember consenting to making my pinned websites' urls public in the first place (probably did :D), but Recent Activity is dangerous, in my opinion, or even showing the websites that a user has in their profile, and perhaps an explicit option or disclaimer "Show the website on your profile" would be good.
With all due respect! :-)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Thanks for the feedback, I'll talk with @taravancil about 2 and 3.
About 1, Beaker only permadeletes an archive once it's cleared from the trash (happens automatically after 2 weeks). If you visit the archive it'll be swarmed for the rest of the session atm.
And in case I didn't make it clear enough in the OP: Especially problematic is removing an unnamed archive because its public key remains exposed in Recent Activity.
Can a checkbox be added: "Publish as Unlisted" before publishing an archive to Hashbase? Then any unlisted archives should never be displayed in "Recent Activity".
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
The following happened with me that made me rethink several assumptions of beaker & hashbase:
Several user assumptions that have been broken by beaker & hashbase, in my opinion:
With all due respect! :-)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: