Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Cohabitation -> statutaryCohabitation #10

Open
dhondtl opened this issue Mar 15, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

Cohabitation -> statutaryCohabitation #10

dhondtl opened this issue Mar 15, 2024 · 2 comments

Comments

@dhondtl
Copy link

dhondtl commented Mar 15, 2024

Label-en name is cohabitation but class appears to have a different name in the EA model. Stick to the name used in FedVoc?

@saxomoose
Copy link
Contributor

Modified in model.

@saxomoose saxomoose reopened this Apr 4, 2024
@JDMKSZ
Copy link

JDMKSZ commented Apr 4, 2024

The FedVoc description of Cohabitation is "Arrangement whereby two people who are not married live together. Can, just like a marriage, form the basis of a family. Legally registered."

Because of the "Legally registered", I presume we are talking about the same concept. However, in Belgium we also have the concept of "feitelijk samenwonend", which is not legally registered. Therefore I think the terminology "cohabitation" is confusing and "statutoryCohabitation" would be more clear. I'd like to rediscuss this in the FedVoc WG

@JDMKSZ JDMKSZ transferred this issue from belgif/thematic Sep 30, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants