Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Generic] When UML says real, XSD has multiple sub types #233

Open
JulieMoncorger opened this issue May 4, 2023 · 3 comments
Open

[Generic] When UML says real, XSD has multiple sub types #233

JulieMoncorger opened this issue May 4, 2023 · 3 comments

Comments

@JulieMoncorger
Copy link
Contributor

JulieMoncorger commented May 4, 2023

A few examples, when UML says real, in XSD :

UML should have more precisions.

@stlejer-morvrini
Copy link

agreed. However by default we shall stick to the type specified in XSD.
I'd suggest we keep a list of these imprecise UML specs for me to push the issue to IHO.

@rik
Copy link
Contributor

rik commented May 5, 2023

Yes, we've implemented the most specific type, as expressed by the XSD.

I don't think we should maintain a list because we've seen the issue in every UML diagram for S127. And we've also seen it in S131. It seems all UML diagrams are under-representing number constraints.

@rik
Copy link
Contributor

rik commented May 5, 2023

This is the same issue for Integer: The UML only express Integer or Real while the XSD expresses more constraints (like Positive or a range).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants