Generalize Pipelinedescription from BEP003 for raw "BIDS" #369
Labels
enhancement
New feature or request
opinions wanted
Please read and offer your opinion on this matter
Any "raw" BIDS dataset is not given by god or a scanner, it is either result of manual labor, a script under
code/
or use of helper tools such as heudiconv. The mere presence ofsourcedata/
supports that claim. But nowhere in BIDS (dataset_description.json) we have formalized fields/form to inform provenance for the dataset. Currently it is only BEP003 (common derivatives) and future BEP on provenance #368 which touch upon that topic. As proper provenance tracking is a bigger job todo, we could at least implement in "raw" BIDSPipelinedescription
approach from BEP003.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: