You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jul 7, 2020. It is now read-only.
The Geomar people suggested that is might be useful to tag specific label tree versions. This is similar to "releases" of GitHub repositories. The use case is, that a specific version of a label tree can be "cited" in a paper. Ideally this should have a DOI.
Thinking about this, a DOI for a label tree in BIIGLE would be hard to come by, as it should be guaranteed to be archived and persistently available. Maybe we could offer a special export of label tree versions to Pangaea and they take care of the archival? This is a similar idea to the "publication report" ( biigle/reports#39 ).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The tagging will be implemented with label tree versions which are described in #31 (second draft). We could offer a label tree export as a CSV for each version on top of that.
Rather than biigle/reports this can be better implemented with biigle/sync. This can be a new "PublicLabelTreeExport" which does not include sensitive user data. This would open up the possibility for a futute "PublicLabelTreeImport" where users can move their label trees themselves between BIIGLE instances.
The Geomar people suggested that is might be useful to tag specific label tree versions. This is similar to "releases" of GitHub repositories. The use case is, that a specific version of a label tree can be "cited" in a paper. Ideally this should have a DOI.
Thinking about this, a DOI for a label tree in BIIGLE would be hard to come by, as it should be guaranteed to be archived and persistently available. Maybe we could offer a special export of label tree versions to Pangaea and they take care of the archival? This is a similar idea to the "publication report" ( biigle/reports#39 ).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: