Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feature request: hide unselected channels in Shank Activity window #39

Open
neurochen opened this issue Feb 9, 2025 · 4 comments
Open

Comments

@neurochen
Copy link

Thanks for your excellent work on SpikeGLX. In our use case, we sometimes select evenly spaced channels along the probe. It would benefit us to have a global view of activity levels across selected contacts along the probe. The current Shank Activity window can't support this well; Although a small pixels/pad value would offer a global view, it makes each contact super small so that the visualization is barely visible. Could you offer a feature to hide all the unselected channels and stack all the selected channels together, similar to the view for the default IMRO where only the top 384 channels are visualized? Appreciated.

@billkarsh
Copy link
Owner

Are you using at most two probes? What if you open the second Graphs window (ctrl+T) to get two more trace viewers and their ShankViewers. Then you could have two ShankViewers per probe to see the upper and lower portions at the same time. Would that work for you?

@neurochen
Copy link
Author

Thanks for the quick reply, Bill. We are using 3 probes at the same time. The approach you mentioned is interesting, but it will not work in our case.

@billkarsh
Copy link
Owner

Compressing the sites to wrong addresses on the probe will not work with anatomy overlays. I am intrigued about visualizing more of the probe at the same time but have to think how to do it. And I have an existing agenda of work to satisfy grants, so I can not promise to solve this immediately.

@neurochen
Copy link
Author

Appreciated! No rush. please remind me here when you add that feature:-)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants