-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Align FASTQmetadata entity to SRA Run #42
Comments
I think this request looks like a clarification of existing functionality in our documentation. That is, we want to draw out in our documentation especially the point that FASTQmetadata (in GEOME) == Run (in SRA). If that is the case, we can add this to our FAQ (https://docs.google.com/document/d/1tEFpclCyJ6aLnypmtdfdjLVhiWQ-rYhGqu5eGhq3s5s/edit) and user help (https://geome-db.org/docs/helpDocumentation.pdf). and then great if you can help with that text.... if there is a request for new features here then we should talk. |
My understanding from RJ is that when GEOME submits multiple runs for the same biosample, it re-submits the biosample entirely. The new feature I am requesting is the ability to submit multiple runs for the same Biosample in SRA. Can we discuss before or during the steering committee meeting? From email of August 21:
|
materialSamples in GEOME are allowed to have multiple Tissues, which can each have multiple FASTQmetadatas. Would it be possible to align this hierarchy to match what is in SRA like so?
GEOME == SRA
materialSample == BioSample
tissue == NA or possibly Experiment
FASTQmetadata == Run
The FASTQMetadata are an important aspect of what GEOME tracks, and a single sample or tissue could have multiple runs of the same data type (e.g. multiple runs of RAD data) or multiple runs of different data types (e.g. a coral sample could have its genome sequenced, and its microbiome metabarcoded).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: